|
Understanding Homosexualism
In a previous newsletter (www.jerustar.com/I-3.htm)
we likened the mindset of the derivative world to a quantum-statistical
turnstile that encourages movements in one direction (more
probable states) while resisting movements in the opposite
direction (less probable states). Ok,
so what’s this all about and what does it have to do with the culture war?
What, for example, does it have to do with “same-sex marriage”?
Physics of the Universe
In Genesis 2:7 we are told that God formed man from the “dust of
the earth” (physics of the universe, oriented toward more
probable states). The atoms that make up our flesh, our bones,
our sinews, our brains, our nervous systems, our cells, our synapses and our
neurons are all governed by the behavioral field of a universe that is
oriented toward more probable states. The
physical orientation of the universe is therefore not something “outside” of
us. It is internalized in our
physical constitution in terms of a general attraction toward—and preference
for—more probable states. What
then? Is the pro-homosexuality agenda of the liberal left a particular
instance of general physical law? Simply put, is it the urge to move toward more probable states? Can it be that simple?
Well, nothing is that “simple” when it comes to human beings, but pile on all
the psychological adjuncts of mankind and the results are inevitable.
Homogeneity vs. Heterogeneity
The word “homogeneous” is a composite of the Greek homo, meaning “one, the same,” and genus, meaning “kind.” The word
“heterogeneous” is a composite of the Greek hetero,
meaning “two, different,” and genus,
“kind.” Given the nature and orientation of the physical world, simple
structures would tend to be more probable
than complex structures; same-kind structures would tend to be more probable than different-kind structures;
homogeneous
structures would tend to be more probable
than heterogeneous
structures.
Physical Systems
Remove all considerations of God and Judeo-Christian morality.
Exclude the Ten Commandments. Strip the human condition of all Divine law,
spiritual restraint and moral discipline. What have you done? You have
reduced human beings to physical systems! How do physical systems behave?
Naturally, they tend to move away from less probable
states (different-kind structures), toward more probable states (same-kind structures).
Slowly and imperceptibly at first, but as time goes on with growing zeal,
increasing fervor, conviction, enthusiasm, dedication and “passionate
intensity” (Yeats), large samples of human beings will begin making cultural
selections in favor of homosexualism.
“Natural Orientation”
If you remove the Divine from the human, what sort of “natural
orientation” would you be left with? Well, if the cosmos were oriented toward
more probable states, then you would expect
all flesh to be oriented toward more probable
states as well. The same derivative spirit that would conform
to the nature of the physical world in idolatry,
would also conform to the orientation of the physical world in homosexualism.
What are we saying? We are saying that without God there would have been no
complex, heterogeneous, Judeo-Christian family structure to speak of, only
same-kind structures, groupings, arrangements, communes, tribes, cults,
gangs, cabals, associations, unions, partnerships and amalgamations. Absent
the design of God, the familial arrangements of mankind would have flowed
into the mold of probability, away from less probable
(different-kind) structures, toward more probable
(same-kind) structures. Remove God from America and you can expect American
culture to gravitate toward homosexualism.
Politically Correct Pseudoscience
What shall we say about the perversions of this age? The
practitioners and purveyors of it have said it all, for they say, “It is our
natural orientation!” thereby confirming everything the Bible has been saying
about the fallen nature of man. Only a few decades ago homosexuality was on
the American Psychological Association’s
list of behavioral disorders requiring psychiatric treatment. With the advent
of the postmodern era—and a few riots—it was taken off the list and is now
assumed to be an immutable and unalterable characteristic of birth! (How did
that happen?) Big Brother and his thought police have now declared homosexuality
to be “a natural orientation,” and “being gay” the attitude of those who have
chosen to go with the flow and no longer resist doing what comes naturally. What
then is this so-called “orientation” all about? Whence the source, origin and
provenance of this urge to merge in same-kind unions? Whence this obsession
with homosexualism among radical feminists? You will find answers to these
and other questions within the pages of In God We
Trust.
Useful Web
Resources
There is a great deal of good research that does try to
investigate the causes of homosexuality, but you won’t hear about it in the derivative
media. Two noteworthy institutions that attempt to do that are NARTH (National Association for Research and
Therapy of Homosexuality) and JONAH (Jews
Offering New Alternatives to Homosexuality).
http://narth.com/ ● http://jonahweb.org/
You will find a great deal of useful information on their
websites, but as of yet neither NARTH nor JONAH has gone so far as to relate
the root causes of homosexuality to the plain vanilla laws of physics.
The newly published book In God We Trust by Victor Shane does just that, arming
those of you on the forefront of the culture war with the rational
wherewithal to turn back the derivative tide and restore this great nation to
the dignity of her origins in God.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
What is America’s culture war really all
about?
Who are the warring factions and what do
they really want?
What set of beliefs drives the ideology of the conservative right?
What set of beliefs
drives the ideology of the liberal left?
How do these beliefs divide America when it
comes to:
● The
Judeo-Christian worldview?
● The Ten
Commandments?
● Marriage
& family values?
● Abortion?
● Homosexualism?
● Euthanasia?
● The
American military?
“Most great movements of history have launched only
after one great book has stirred the hearts of men. Such a book is In God We Trust by Victor Shane which
makes the moral argument for America’s third great religious reawakening.
When the battle is ultimately won and civilization is successfully defended,
history will remember the book that started it all.”
—Rabbi Daniel Lapin,
President,
American Alliance of Jews
and Christians
http://www.aajc.org/
“Though Victor and I have different understandings of
the details of religion, Victor being a devout Christian and I being an
orthodox Jew, clearly in his book, In
God We Trust, we share identical views regarding the desperate need for a
return to the Biblically based moral code that once prevailed in American
society and upon which America was founded. Victor has put into words the
concerns and desires of the silent majority of Americans which must cease to
be silent.”
—Gerald Schroeder, Ph.D.,
Jerusalem,
Israel http://www.geraldschroeder.com/
“The purpose and content of this book are clearly
stated in the subtitle, Understanding
the Culture War in a Scientific Age: The Pitched Battle for the Soul of
America. I think the author has
contributed significantly toward fulfilling this purpose. I am particularly
impressed by the selection and integration of principles and presuppositions
in the early chapters, followed by application of these principles in
subsequent chapters. He adheres to the Judeo-Christian worldview, but the
book should be of significance and interest to readers whatever their
worldview may be.”
—Robert B. Fischer, Ph.D.
Provost,
Biola University
|
